An integral orientation considers that leadership is constitutively linked with followership and vice versa. Facing the diversity of approaches and theories in both fields, a comprehensive conceptualization is presented that is suited to investigating complex, interrelated processes of leading and following. Based on a holonic understanding, integral perspectives cover the interdependent subjective, intersubjective, and objective dimensions of leaders and followers; respectively, leadership and followership within a developmental perspective. Finally, the paper outlines some theoretical and methodological implications and perspectives for future research of an integral leadership and followership.
|Published (Last):||9 July 2015|
|PDF File Size:||9.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.89 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Power, Politics, Networking and Negotiation. Auth with social network: Stages of Development Individualized dyadix interactions creating in-groups and out-groups. How do education and experience, described as follower influencing characteristics? Contingency leadership variables and styles.
The Foundations of Modern Leadership. Support for self worth Lussier, R. To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. General Definition Hard to define. How and What to delegate? Auth with social network: Good leaders develop through a never-ending process of self-study, education, training, and experience. Vertical linkage model relationships.
Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation What are the differences between in-groups and out-groups? Manager ask something to do extra work than job requirements?
TOP Related Articles.
Module 7 Dyadic Relationshp, Followershp & Delegation L'SHIP-7
DYADIC RELATIONSHIP FOLLOWERSHIP AND DELEGATION PDF